Pakistan SAF technology developments are positioning the agricultural-rich nation as a potential dark horse in Asia’s race toward aviation decarbonisation. As Asian airlines face mounting pressure to reduce emissions amid global climate imperatives, Pakistan’s unique approach of converting agricultural waste into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) could offer a regional model worth examining.

Converting an environmental problem into economic opportunity

The smog that blankets major Pakistani and neighbouring Indian cities each harvest season has become an annual crisis, driven largely by the burning of agricultural residue. The practice, particularly prevalent in Punjab province, releases particulate matter that compromises air quality across borders.

However, this challenge presents a technological opportunity that Pakistan’s emerging SAF sector aims to capitalise on. “Crop residues burned during both winter and summer in Pakistan represent an underutilised resource with immense potential for SAF production,” noted experts in an April 2025 report by The Express Tribune, highlighting a practical technological solution to an entrenched environmental issue.

The technology equation

Pakistan SAF technology implementation focuses on two principal conversion methods, each suited to different agricultural inputs:

1. Hydroprocessing Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA): For lipid-based feedstocks including used cooking oil and non-edible oils
2. Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ): Optimised for converting sugar-based inputs like wheat straw and rice husks

The technologies produce aviation fuels chemically identical to conventional jet fuel, requiring no aircraft modifications, and deliver substantially improved carbon profiles. A third technology using carbon dioxide capture remains in development but holds promise for further emissions reductions. Dr Adeel Ghayur, described by The Express Tribune as an “eminent energy scientist and expert in circular economy,” indicated that commercial SAF technologies can scale from 100,000 to one million tonnes of annual production capacity, with corresponding economic impacts.

Asia’s first private SAF project

The December 2024 announcement of a $121 million SAF facility in Sheikhupura represented a milestone not just for Pakistan but for all of Asia. According to Pakistan Today, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has committed $86.2 million to the project, with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) providing $35 million. What makes this development particularly noteworthy in the Asian context is its designation by the ADB as “the first private sector-led SAF project in Asia and the Pacific,” excluding China.

For a region where state involvement typically dominates energy infrastructure, this private-sector approach merits attention from investors and policymakers across Asia. The facility is operated by SAFCO Venture Holdings Limited and owned by Taimur Shaikh and Ali Shaikh, and presents compelling environmental and economic metrics: projected annual production of 200,000 tonnes of SAF, reduction of 500,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide yearly, creation of 300 direct jobs, and facilitation of approximately 20,000 indirect employment opportunities in the supply chain and tertiary industries.

The regional competitiveness question

While Pakistan’s SAF ambitions are technologically sound, important questions remain about its competitiveness in an Asian market where Singapore, Japan, and South Korea have already established advanced biofuel capabilities.

The price difference remains substantial, with SAF currently commanding approximately $2,500 per metric tonne versus $700 for conventional jet fuel. For price-sensitive Asian carriers navigating post-pandemic recovery, this cost gap presents significant challenges to adoption.

Dr. Ghayur said in The Express Tribune that “strengthening R&D is essential for Pakistan to remain competitive in the global SAF market, secure its position as a hub for innovation, and maintain leadership as SAF adoption rises across Asia.” The acknowledgement reflects awareness of the technological race underway in the region.

For Asian nations with similar agricultural profiles – Bangladesh, Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia – Pakistan’s SAF initiative offers a potential template for converting agricultural waste into aviation biofuels and addresses seasonal air pollution events. The multiplicative benefits – enhanced energy security, emissions reductions, rural economic opportunities, and foreign direct investment – align with development priorities across South and Southeast Asia.

Four-dimensional solution

Pakistan SAF technology implementation addresses four interconnected challenges that resonate in developing Asian economies:

1. Energy security: Reducing petroleum import dependence via domestic production
2. Economic development: Creating value-added manufacturing with substantial job creation potential
3. Foreign direct investment: Attracting capital for industrial-scale bioprocessing operations
4. Environmental mitigation: Addressing agricultural burning emissions and aviation carbon footprints

Critical path forward

For Pakistan’s SAF sector to achieve its potential, several hurdles will need to be surmounted. First, continued investment beyond the initial Sheikhupura facility will be necessary to achieve meaningful scale. Second, as SAF technologies evolve, Pakistan will need to maintain technological competitiveness through sustained R&D investment. Finally, efficiency improvements in agricultural waste collection and transportation will be essential to maintain favourable economics.

The byproduct potential enhances the business case further, with SAFCO’s facility projected to produce 18,000 tonnes of bionaphtha annually for sustainable plastics production, according to Pakistan Today.

As Dr Ghayur concluded in The Express Tribune, “The comprehensive policy roadmap will serve as both a blueprint and a catalyst to propel Pakistan to the forefront of the global SAF revolution.”

While significant challenges remain in scaling production, optimising costs, and matching competitive alternatives, Pakistan’s SAF technology trajectory represents a distinctive approach to circular economy implementation with potential regional application across all of Asia’s agricultural economies.

The post Could Pakistan SAF technology transform its agricultural waste crisis? appeared first on TechWire Asia.

Chinese AI agent Manus has emerged as the latest breakthrough in artificial intelligence technology, generating a significant buzz in the global tech community for its advanced autonomous capabilities.

Developed by Tencent Holdings-backed startup Butterfly Effect, Manus claims to be the world’s first general AI agent, distinguishing itself from conventional chatbots by focusing on task completion rather than just conversation. Unlike traditional AI assistants that primarily handle dialogue, the Chinese AI agent Manus utilises multiple AI models to perform complex, multi-step tasks autonomously.

During its invitation-only online preview last week, Manus demonstrated impressive capabilities, including creating customised websites, screening résumés, and producing property recommendation reports based on specific criteria. Manus executes complex tasks from start to finish, delivering complete solutions rather than just suggestions.

“The video says the AI agent is more advanced than a chatbot because it doesn’t only generate ideas but delivers tangible results, like producing a report recommending properties to buy based on specific criteria,” reported CNN Business.

How Manus works

In a post on X, Peak Ji Yichao, co-founder and chief scientist at Butterfly Effect, stated the Chinese AI agent Manus was built using existing large language models, including Anthropic’s Claude and fine-tuned versions of Alibaba’s open-source Qwen. The multi-model approach enables more sophisticated reasoning and action capabilities.

According to MIT Technology Review, which obtained access to the platform, using Manus “feels like collaborating with a highly intelligent and efficient intern.”

The publication tested Manus on three tasks: compiling a list of journalists covering China tech, searching for property listings with specific criteria, and nominating candidates for MIT Technology Review’s Innovators Under 35 list.

“While it occasionally lacks understanding of what it’s being asked to do, makes incorrect assumptions, or cuts corners to expedite tasks, it explains its reasoning clearly, is remarkably adaptable, and can improve substantially when provided with detailed instructions or feedback,” wrote Caiwei Chen in MIT Technology Review. What differentiates Manus is “Manus’s Computer” window, which allows users to observe what the agent is doing and intervene at any point. The transparency and collaborative machine-human approach gives users greater control over the AI’s actions.

Limited access despite growing interest

Despite generating significant buzz, access to Manus remains highly restricted. Fewer than 1% of users on the wait-list have received an invite code. The platform’s Discord channel has attracted more than 186,000 members, indicating substantial interest from potential users worldwide.

According to Chinese media outlet 36Kr, Manus’s per-task cost is approximately $2, which is claimed to be one-tenth of the cost of OpenAI’s DeepResearch service. If its server infrastructure improves, this cost efficiency could position the Chinese AI agent Manus as a preferred choice for individual professionals and small teams.

The system isn’t without limitations, however. MIT Technology Review reported that Manus encountered obstacles with pay-walled content and experienced occasional crashes due to high service loads. The message “Due to the current high service load, tasks cannot be created. Please try again in a few minutes” appeared multiple times during testing.

Strategic partnership with Alibaba

Recognising the potential for growth in the Chinese market, Manus recently announced a strategic partnership with Alibaba. According to the South China Morning Post, the March 11 announcement revealed “Manus will engage in strategic cooperation with Alibaba’s Qwen team to meet the needs of Chinese users. ”

The two companies are working closely to ensure all Manus functions are available on “domestic models and computing platforms,” although no specific launch date was provided. A representative of Alibaba’s cloud computing unit confirmed the cooperation, saying both parties are collaborating on open-source models and looking forward to “working with more global AI innovators.”

Alibaba’s QwQ-32B reasoning model advances in parallel

The partnership comes when Alibaba is progressing AI development. On March 6, the company unveiled its latest reasoning model, QwQ-32B, claiming its capabilities surpass OpenAI’s o1-mini and rival DeepSeek’s R1 model. The news was impactful enough to boost Alibaba’s Hong Kong-listed shares by 8% on the announcement day.

“Alibaba touted its new model, QwQ-32B, in an online statement as delivering exceptional performance, almost entirely surpassing OpenAI-o1-mini and rivalling the strongest open-source reasoning model, DeepSeek-R1,” reported CNN Business.

What makes this development notable is the model’s efficiency – Alibaba claims QwQ-32B contains just 32 billion parameters compared to DeepSeek R1’s 671 billion, suggesting significantly lower computational requirements. The tech giant intends to invest at least 380 billion yuan ($52.4 billion) in AI and cloud computing infrastructure over the next three years, underscoring its commitment to establishing leadership in AI.

China’s AI ecosystem gains momentum

As the Chinese AI agent Manus continues to develop through its partnership with Alibaba, it symbolises a broader phenomenon. The Chinese government’s policies include promoting technological self-reliance, generous funding initiatives, and a robust pipeline of AI graduates from top Chinese universities, which together have created a fertile ecosystem for progression.

Chinese firms are now creating increasingly advanced large language models that compete directly with Western counterparts. The Chinese government’s pledge to support “emerging industries and industries of the future” with increased funding for artificial intelligence, combined with Alibaba’s massive $52.4 billion investment commitment, demonstrates the nation’s strategic prioritisation of AI development.

The centrally-coordinated approach is yielding results. The emergence of tools like Manus suggests that the global AI landscape is evolving into a genuinely multi-polar space, with Chinese innovations increasingly setting trends rather than following them.

The post Chinese AI agent Manus is breakthrough in autonomous AI technology appeared first on TechWire Asia.

DeepSeek AI in Chinese EVs is quickly becoming the new battleground for automakers, with companies trying to secure their competitive edge in China’s cutthroat electric vehicle market. AI technology has emerged as a important differentiator, and Phate Zhang, founder of CnEVPost, warns that vehicles without DeepSeek integration risk being “edged out of the market” entirely.

The South China Morning Post reports that DeepSeek AI adoption in Chinese EVs has gained momentum, with over a dozen automakers announcing integration plans in recent weeks. The technology has attracted manufacturers, from EV giant BYD to emerging players like the Stellantis-backed Leapmotor.

Integrating DeepSeek AI in Chinese EVs represents a significant technological leap forward. The Hangzhou-based AI company has captured global attention with its recent release of two advanced open-source AI models: DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1.

The models are particularly notable for their ability to operate at a fraction of the cost and computing power typically required for large language model (LLM) projects, making them an attractive option for automakers looking to enhance their vehicles’ capabilities.

BYD, China’s leading EV manufacturer, has announced plans to integrate DeepSeek with its Xuanji vehicle software. The company aims to offer preliminary self-driving capabilities in nearly all its models at no additional cost, making autonomous driving features more accessible to mainland Chinese customers.

Its strategy includes equipping at least 21 models – including the affordable Seagull hatchback, priced at 69,800 yuan (US$9,575) – with Indigenous Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS).

The widespread adoption of DeepSeek AI in Chinese EVs extends beyond BYD. Other major players in the Chinese automotive industry, including Geely, Great Wall Motor, Chery Automobile, and SAIC Motor, have also announced plans to incorporate DeepSeek’s AI into their digital cockpits, highlighting the industry-wide adoption of this technology.

According to research firm IDC, DeepSeek’s open-source model has fostered a collaborative innovation ecosystem through platforms like GitHub, where global developers participate in optimisation and security testing.

The collaborative approach is expected to significantly improve the ability to effectively deploy, train, and utilise large language models. DeepSeek AI’s market impact on Chinese EVs is expected to be substantial. Zhang Yongwei, general secretary of China EV100, projects that by 2025, approximately 15 million cars – representing two-thirds of national sales – will be equipped with preliminary autonomous driving systems.

The forecast underscores the rapid transformation of China’s automotive landscape through AI integration. The competitive pressure in China’s EV market intensifies, as evidenced by aggressive pricing strategies. The China Passenger Car Association reports that manufacturers reduced prices on 195 models between January and November last year, compared to 150 models in 2023.

In this context, DeepSeek AI integration has become a important differentiator for automakers seeking to maintain their market position. As the integration of DeepSeek AI in Chinese EVs accelerates, the technology appears to be not just a trend but a necessary evolution.

The movement potentially sets new standards for the global automotive industry.

The post Why are Chinese EV manufacturers racing to integrate DeepSeek’s AI technology? appeared first on TechWire Asia.

Chinese iPhone users may soon experience AI features powered by home-grown technology, as Apple Inc. is reportedly planning to integrate Alibaba’s Qwen AI models into its devices. The move comes as the tech giant seeks to bridge a critical gap in its Chinese market offerings, where its global Apple Intelligence features remain unavailable due to regulatory restrictions.

The potential partnership, first reported by The Information and subsequently detailed by the South China Morning Post, suggests that Apple has chosen Alibaba’s Qwen AI model to power its AI features in China. This decision reflects Apple’s pragmatic approach to maintaining its competitive edge in the world’s largest smartphone market, while also adhering to local regulations.

Strategic implications for both giants

Industry analysts view this potential collaboration as a win-win situation for both companies. For Apple, partnering with a local AI powerhouse could help navigate China’s complex regulatory landscape while ensuring its devices remain competitive in a market increasingly dominated by AI-powered smartphones.

For Alibaba, securing Apple as a flagship partner could significantly boost its credibility in the global AI race. “The partnership between Alibaba and Apple partially validates Alibaba’s capabilities in AI and Qwen 2.5 Max,” notes Morningstar’s senior equity analyst Chelsey Lam. 

“Selecting the right partner to deliver a good Apple Intelligence experience will help them reinvigorate iPhone sales in China.”

Technical Prowess and Market Timing

Alibaba’s Qwen AI model has recently gained significant recognition in the global AI community. According to the collaborative machine-learning platform Hugging Face, Qwen is powering the world’s top 10 open-source large language models (LLMs). This technical achievement likely played a crucial role in Apple’s decision to partner with Alibaba.

This development’s timing is particularly noteworthy, as Apple prepares to host its China developer conference in Shanghai on March 25. The event has sparked speculation about the possible launch of Apple Intelligence features for Chinese iPhone users, potentially powered by Alibaba’s Qwen model.

Market response and future implications

The market has responded positively to the news, with Alibaba’s stock price gaining 1.3% in the US on Tuesday, following a 7.6% increase on Monday. Apple’s stock also saw a 2.2% increase, indicating investor confidence in the potential partnership.

The collaboration could have far-reaching implications for both companies. For Apple, it represents a practical solution to maintain its premium positioning in the Chinese market while complying with local regulations. 

As industry experts indicate, this partnership could increase Alibaba’s interest from other global technology companies seeking AI partnerships in China.

Looking ahead

While neither Apple nor Alibaba has officially confirmed the partnership, the development has generated significant buzz among Chinese iOS developers. The potential integration of Qwen AI models into iPhones could open new opportunities for local developers to create AI-powered applications tailored to the Chinese market.

As the March 25 developer conference approaches, the tech community will watch closely for any official announcements regarding this partnership. If confirmed, this collaboration could set a precedent for how international technology companies adapt their AI strategies to succeed in the Chinese market while complying with local regulations.

The reported partnership underscores a growing trend of localisation in AI technology. Global companies are increasingly seeking local partners to maintain their competitive edge in specific markets.

For Apple, whose success in China has been crucial to its global growth story, this adaptation could prove essential in maintaining its market position amid rising competition from local smartphone manufacturers with integrated AI capabilities.

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

The post Will Apple Intelligence launch in China through Alibaba’s Qwen AI models? appeared first on TechWire Asia.

A dramatic shift in open-source AI development is emerging from China, where startup DeepSeek fundamentally challenges how artificial intelligence evolves. By making its technology freely available for anyone to download, modify, and build on, DeepSeek has ignited a debate about the future of AI and global technological leadership.

The cost revolution in open-source AI development

When DeepSeek’s R1 model overtook ChatGPT as the most downloaded free app on the US Apple App Store in January 2025, it represented more than just market success – it signalled a potential shift in AI economics.

At just $5.6 million in development costs – roughly one-tenth the price of Meta’s similarly open-source Llama model – DeepSeek has demonstrated that cutting-edge AI doesn’t require massive investments. Unlike established players like OpenAI and Anthropic, whose models remain closely guarded secrets, DeepSeek opted for transparency, offering its code and technical documentation to the global developer community.

The approach to open-source AI development hasn’t compromised capability; the model demonstrates reasoning and mathematical skills comparable to more expensive rivals. The implications extend beyond finances. Traditional AI development requires massive computing resources, contributing to high electricity consumption and carbon emissions.

DeepSeek’s efficient training method could pioneer more sustainable AI scaling, which is particularly important as these technologies become ubiquitous. However, the “open-source” designation demands scrutiny. According to the Open Source Initiative (OSI), true open-source AI must provide detailed information about training data and allow unrestricted study, use, and modification of the system.

While DeepSeek has released its model weights and some technical documentation, it hasn’t fully disclosed its training data, raising questions about complete transparency.

Global impact and security concerns

The democratisation of AI through cost-effective open-source development could accelerate innovation worldwide. Smaller companies and developers in regions with limited access to cutting-edge technology can now build on established models rather than starting from scratch. The collaborative approach could catalyse more diverse applications and solutions to real-world problems.

Yet this accessibility comes with risks. Critics, particularly in the US, worry about potential misuse of open-source AI models, from developing bioweapons to spreading misinformation. The controversy intensified when OpenAI announced an investigation into whether DeepSeek may have “inappropriately distilled” its models – essentially using OpenAI’s outputs to train its competing system.

The geopolitical implications are significant. As Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted, “The is a huge geopolitical competition, and China’s running at it super hard.” DeepSeek’s success has prompted reflection on the traditional American model of proprietary AI development, with some arguing that the US should embrace more open methodologies to maintain technological leadership.

Looking ahead, DeepSeek’s breakthrough, with its $5.6 million price tag, could reshape the entire AI landscape. The company has proven that efficient, cost-effective open-source AI development is possible without the massive resources typically associated with cutting-edge models.

This could lead to a more diverse and competitive AI ecosystem, with innovation emerging from unexpected quarters. However, the path forward remains complex. Regulatory frameworks are evolving as governments struggle to balance innovation with security concerns worldwide.

The Trump administration has yet to fully articulate its AI policy, though some officials have supported open-source development. What’s clear is that DeepSeek’s efficient approach to open-source AI development has challenged fundamental assumptions about the field, forcing the industry to reconsider what’s possible with limited resources and an open approach.\

Looking to revamp your digital transformation strategy?

Learn more about Digital Transformation Week taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with IoT Tech Expo, AI & Big Data Expo, Cyber Security & Cloud Expo, and other leading events.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

The post Is open-source AI the future? DeepSeek’s $5.6M challenge to Big Tech appeared first on TechWire Asia.

Chinese tech giant Huawei shattered market expectations on Wednesday, announcing a staggering 860 billion yuan ($118.3 billion) in revenue for 2024 – its fastest growth since 2016. The 22% surge is a direct challenge to US technology restrictions, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing technology trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

Chairman Howard Liang Hua’s announcement at a Guangdong provincial government conference revealed that the company’s “overall operations met expectations,” powered by robust performance in its consumer business segment and rapidly-expanding smart car solutions. 

The achievement is particularly noteworthy as it represents Huawei’s second-highest revenue figure, following a 891 billion yuan peak in 2020. The strong performance in 2024 shows a remarkable recovery from the 704.2 billion yuan posted in 2023, highlighting the company’s successful adaptation to a challenging operating environment.

The significance of the growth becomes more apparent when considering the context of US sanctions imposed in May 2019. The restrictions were further tightened in August 2020, explicitly targeting Huawei’s access to advanced semiconductors that were developed or produced using US technology, regardless of their manufacturing location. 

Despite those substantial obstacles, Huawei has managed to sustain its operations and significantly expand them.

Strategic pivots and innovation 

However, the path to success has required significant investments and strategic adjustment. The company’s financial data reveals a 13.7% decline in net profit to 62.9 billion yuan for the first nine months of 2024, compared to 72.9 billion yuan in 2023. 

The reduction in profitability reflects Huawei’s aggressive investment in research and development, a crucial strategy in its quest for technological self-sufficiency. Huawei’s response to US restrictions has been multifaceted, positioning itself as a leader in China’s push for technological independence. 

Founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, the company has become emblematic in China’s efforts to overcome US restrictions. The restrictions were initially imposed due to concerns about potential military applications of US core technology. The company’s recent initiatives in artificial intelligence underscore its commitment to maintaining technological leadership. 

Last week, Huawei’s cloud-computing unit made a significant move by making DeepSeek’s AI models available to end users through its Ascend cloud service. According to company statements, the performance of the models matches those running on global premium graphic processing units, demonstrating Huawei’s continued ability to compete at the highest technological levels.

Prospects and industry impact 

Liang’s comments about AI being “at an accelerated stage of development” and its application “ushering in a critical period of time” suggest Huawei’s strategic focus on emerging technologies. 

This perspective was reinforced by Guangdong Communist Party chief Huang Kunming, who praised Huawei’s “leading digital technology” and its role in empowering industries. The company’s success in 2024 has implications beyond its operations. 

As a major player in global technology markets, Huawei’s ability to grow despite restrictions challenges assumptions about the effectiveness of trade sanctions in limiting technological advancement. The company’s consumer business revival, particularly in smartphone sales, and its expansion into new areas like smart car solutions demonstrate its market adaptation and innovation capacity.

Huawei’s performance raises important questions about the future of global technology supply chains and the ongoing technology competition between the US and China. While the company faces continued challenges in accessing certain advanced technologies, its successful pivot to alternative growth strategies and focus on self-sufficiency suggests a resilient business model that can withstand significant external pressures.

The company’s ability to maintain strong revenue growth while investing heavily in research and development positions it well for future challenges. However, the impact of reduced profit margins and the ongoing need for technological self-sufficiency will likely continue to shape Huawei’s strategic decisions in the coming years.

This remarkable revenue performance in 2024 demonstrates Huawei’s resilience and highlights the complex nature of global technology competition, where innovation and adaptation can sometimes overcome even the most stringent regulatory challenges. 

The post Huawei: Revenue growth defies US tech restrictions with 22% surge in 2024 appeared first on TechWire Asia.

The latest escalation in the US-China trade war has sent shockwaves through global markets as Beijing unveiled a calculated series of retaliatory measures against American businesses, marking a significant intensification of economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

The Chinese government’s response, triggered by President Trump’s blanket 10% tariff on Chinese imports, demonstrates a sophisticated approach to economic warfare by the Chinese. Its measures target strategic sectors from technology to rare earth metals with careful calibration of their impact on domestic markets.

Strategic targeting of American business interests

Beijing has said it will introduce a 10% tariff on US agricultural machinery and a 15% charge on crude oil imports, which will likely pressure specific US sectors rather than wage all-out economic warfare.

The measured approach is particularly evident in China’s targeting of US tech giant Google through an anti-monopoly investigation, despite the company’s limited presence in the Chinese market since 2010. The energy sector measures are more noteworthy, with China imposing a 10% tax on liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the US. While China has been increasing its LNG imports from America, with volumes nearly doubling since 2018, the overall impact will be limited.

US imports account for just 1.7% of China’s total crude oil purchases from abroad, suggesting Beijing has chosen its targets carefully, as ones that won’t significantly disrupt domestic energy security. China’s strategic calculation is further reinforced its existing strong energy relationships with alternative supplying countries, particularly Russia, where it has secured oil at discounted rates.

Rare metals and resource control

The most significant aspect of China’s response lies in its restriction of rare metal exports, which will have far-reaching implications for global supply chains right across the technology sector. With China controlling approximately 90% of global refined rare metal output, imposing export controls on 25 important metals, such as tungsten, could affect everything from aerospace technology to consumer electronics.

The timing of President Trump’s subsequent overture to Ukraine for rare earth metals supply, in exchange for $300 billion in support, underscores the significance of this particular countermeasure.

The automotive sector has not been spared, with China implementing a 10% tariff on pick-up trucks and large cars made in the US. However, this measure’s impact may be limited given China’s relatively low import volume of American vehicles and its established automotive trade relationships with European and Japanese manufacturers.

Beijing’s strategy consistently targets sectors where alternative suppliers are readily available to it. In a move that signals Beijing’s willingness to use regulatory power as a trade weapon, the addition of PVH, owner of Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, to China’s ‘unreliable entity’ list represents a deliberate targeting of American consumer brands. The designation could lead to difficult challenges for these companies in the Chinese market, including potential fines, regulatory investigations, and complications with employee visas.

The Chinese policies mirror similar actions the US took through its entity list, highlighting the increasingly complex interplay between trade policy, regulatory oversight, and jingoism. Agricultural machinery tariffs deserve special attention. They align with China’s broader strategy of reducing dependence on foreign technology while building domestic capabilities. In recent years, China has significantly increased investments in the sector, making these tariffs more about protecting and promoting domestic industry than punishing US manufacturers.

The dual-purpose approach characterises much of Beijing’s response to US trade pressure. According to a research note by Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China Economics at financial insight firm Capital Economics, China’s targeted measures affect approximately $20 billion worth of annual imports, representing about 12% of China’s total imports from the US. While this appears modest compared to the US’ $450 billion worth of targeted Chinese goods, Beijing’s selective response suggests a strategic approach aimed at maximising impact while maintaining economic stability.

Global implications and future outlook

The global implications of the trade dispute extend beyond bilateral relations. Restricting rare metal exports could create ripple effects throughout global supply chains, affecting industries from consumer electronics to defence manufacturing.

The global business community will watch closely as both nations prepare for potential negotiations, with Trump announcing plans to speak directly with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The scheduled implementation of China’s measures on February 10 is a deadline that will reveal either a diplomatic breakthrough or a further deterioration in US-China trade relations. The current escalation represents more than just a trade dispute; it reflects deeper tensions between the world’s two largest economies as they navigate issues of technological supremacy, economic security, and global influence.

As this new chapter in the US-China trade war unfolds, one outcome may well be different speeds of innovation in an industry that has always used the word ‘global’ when discussing the rapid speed of technological change.

The post Trade War 2.0: China strikes back at US with tech and metal sanctions appeared first on TechWire Asia.

The possibility of a forced ByteDance TikTok sale is real today as the US Supreme Court considers the Chinese tech giant’s last-ditch effort to prevent a mandated divestiture or shutdown of its US operations by January 19, 2025.

The Beijing-based tech powerhouse faces unprecedented challenges as it confronts American legislation that could force the first-ever sale of a central Chinese social media platform in the US. According to Bloomberg‘s analysis, the stakes are exceptionally high for China’s tech sector, as the case could set a precedent for how Western nations handle Chinese-owned digital platforms.

Legal challenges and Beijing’s position

Chinese authorities have taken a firm stance against what they view as forced technology transfers under the guise of national security concerns. The position significantly complicates ByteDance’s options, as any potential sale would likely require Beijing’s approval.

The Chinese government’s warning about potential retaliatory measures against US companies underscores the broader implications for Asian tech firms operating globally.

The US Supreme Court will hear TikTok’s challenge today, though Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matthew Schettenhelm estimates only a 30% chance of success. This relatively low probability raises concerns among Asian tech investors about the precedent it might set for other Chinese companies operating in Western markets.

Investment and valuation implications

A potential ByteDance TikTok sale could command a price tag of $40-50 billion, making it one of the most significant forced divestitures in tech history. The valuation reflects TikTok’s considerable market penetration in the US, where approximately 170 million Americans use the platform.

The company has invested heavily in addressing US concerns, including over $2 billion in Project Texas, its data security initiative. Previous potential buyers, including Microsoft Corp. and Oracle, have explored acquisition possibilities, but no clear frontrunner emerged who could both afford the purchase and navigate the complex regulatory landscape.

The uncertainty has created ripples across Asian markets, where investors closely monitor the impact on regional tech valuations. For ByteDance, losing the US market would significantly impact its global expansion strategy.

While the company maintains a strong presence across Asia and other regions, the US market represents a crucial advertising revenue and innovation source. The potential ban could particularly affect TikTok Shop, the company’s e-commerce initiative that has seen remarkable success in Southeast Asian markets and was planned for aggressive US expansion in 2024.

Political complexities and international relations

The situation is complicated by President-elect Trump’s unexpected opposition to the ban, reversing his previous stance. While potentially beneficial for ByteDance, his political shift creates uncertainty in Washington and Beijing. The Chinese tech community is watching, as this could influence future US-China tech relations.

Several of Trump’s proposed cabinet members, including Secretary of State nominee Marco Rubio, have strongly advocated the ban, creating additional layers of complexity in the political landscape. The internal US political discord has caught the attention of Asian governments and tech firms, who see it as indicative of Chinese companies’ challenges in Western markets.

Market implications for Asian tech

The outcome of this legal battle could reshape how Asian tech companies, particularly Chinese firms, approach international expansion. If ByteDance is forced to sell TikTok’s US operations, it might prompt other Asian tech giants to reconsider their global strategies, particularly in Western markets where national security concerns could impact their operations.

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals’ December ruling upheld the law’s constitutionality and sent shockwaves through Asia’s tech sector. The court’s acceptance of US government concerns about Chinese data access and propaganda risks could set precedents affecting other Chinese tech companies operating internationally.

Alternative scenarios and future outlook

While a complete US exit would be significant, TikTok’s billion-plus global user base, predominantly in Asia, could help cushion the blow. The platform’s strong presence in markets like Indonesia, Japan, and South Korea provides a robust foundation for continued growth, even without US operations.

The Supreme Court’s decision, expected before January 19, will be closely watched by tech companies and investors across Asia. As Bloomberg reports, while alternative scenarios exist – including potential regulatory compromises – the outcome could fundamentally alter how Chinese tech companies navigate international markets.

For ByteDance and the broader Asian tech sector, this case represents more than just TikTok’s fate in the US market. It could establish new precedents for how Asian tech companies navigate increasingly complex international regulations and security concerns, potentially reshaping the global digital landscape for years.

The post Can ByteDance escape a forced TikTok sale? What’s at stake for Asian tech appeared first on TechWire Asia.

A fundamental transformation in how we create software is underway. The arcane-to-many languages of Python, Java, and C++ – considered the gatekeepers of software development – are facing an unexpected challenge: plain English. What started as a provocative tweet from Tesla’s AI director, Andrej Karpathy, has evolved into a transformative movement reshaping how we think about programming.

The statistics are telling. According to Stability AI CEO Emad Mostaque, AI-generated code now accounts for 41% of GitHub’s content. The shift toward natural language programming is more than just speculation. It’s a measurable reality catching the attention of tech’s most prominent players.

NVIDIA’s CEO, Jensen Huang, has become one of the most vocal advocates for the transformation, a stance that will promote sales of AI-related hardware, in which he has something of a vested interest. At the World Government Summit, he articulated a vision where computing technology evolves to understand human language, eliminating the need for traditional programming. Huang’s vision isn’t just about making coding easier – it’s about fundamentally changing who can participate in software creation.

Microsoft’s strategic investment in this future, mainly through GitHub Copilot, adds substantial weight to the movement. Under Satya Nadella’s leadership, the company has aligned its tools with a broader mission of democratising software development, making it accessible to those without traditional coding backgrounds. As a secondary effect, new-generation developers will be reliant on Copilot – another vested interest to add to the mix.

But beneath the revolutionary rhetoric and rebuttals lies a more nuanced reality. While tools like GitHub Copilot and Cursor AI excel at translating English commands into at least partly-functional code, seasoned developers point to the AI generators’ limitations. Mission-critical systems and complex software architectures still benefit from the precision and control that traditional programming languages provide. It’s not about replacement, they argue, but augmentation.

The ripple effects of the beginnings of the transformation extend beyond traditional software development. Data analytics platforms that embrace natural language interfaces allow researchers and analysts to query complex datasets using conversational commands. Apache Spark’s English SDK exemplifies this trend, enabling data scientists to generate insights without writing conventional code.

However, the democratisation of programming through natural language brings its own set of challenges. As Jensen Huang points out, success in this new paradigm requires mastery of “prompt engineering” – crafting precise instructions that AI can accurately interpret.

This suggests that while the technical barriers may shift, the need for specialised skills remains. For organisations, the implications are significant. Natural language programming promises faster development cycles and reduced training costs, potentially transforming how businesses approach software development. Yet questions about scalability, maintenance, and quality in AI-generated code remain at the forefront of technical discussions.

Industry experts increasingly envision a future where natural language programming and traditional coding coexist in a complementary relationship. The hybrid approach could combine the accessibility of English commands with the precision of conventional programming languages, creating a more inclusive still-robust development ecosystem.

As we move towards the end of 2024, the transformation of programming currently under way is undeniable. The question is no longer whether natural language will play a role in coding but how to harness its potential and address its limitations. The future of programming will not be an either/or choice between English and traditional languages but a sophisticated blend that makes software development.

The real revolution isn’t just in the tools we use to code but in who gets to participate in building the digital future in software. As natural language programming evolves, it may finally deliver on the long-promised democratisation of software development – not by replacing traditional programming but by expanding the community of creators who turn ideas into reality.

The post Natural language programming: The code revolution  appeared first on TechWire Asia.

Just three months ago, Apple’s launch of the iPhone 16 met with little enthusiasm in the Chinese market, as consumers hoping for AI features found themselves disappointed. The muted reception was particularly stark when contrasted with Huawei’s strategic counter-punch—launching its own AI-powered device mere hours after Apple’s announcement, complete with sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities up and running, somthing that Apple couldn’t yet offer in the region.

As Apple seeks to launch its AI features in China, the tech giant is discovering that even having a trillion dollars doesn’t mean it can easily penetrate Beijing’s regulatory firewall. The company’s struggles in China expose a broader challenge facing Western tech companies: navigate the complex maze of Chinese AI regulations or risk being left out of one of the world’s most lucrative markets.

The stakes are high for Apple. With China accounting for 17% of its total revenue last year and an 8% decline already recorded amid rising competition from Huawei and Chinese manufacturers, the pressure to maintain market relevance is intense. Yet, the path forward is anything but straightforward.

The Cyberspace Administration of China’s stance is unambiguou: foreign companies must partner with local entities for AI service provision, systems that have had their LLMs approved by the authorities. Otherwise, the companies like Apple will have to wait for approval of their different back-end models. This message echoed clearly through the corridors of the recent World Internet Conference in Wuzhen.

Tim Cook’s third visit to China this year, meeting with Premier Li Qiang, underscores how seriously Apple is taking the issue. Apple has begun discussions with potential local partners like Baidu, ByteDance, and Moonshot. Negotiations, therefore, represent more than mere business dealings – they’re a testament to China’s growing technological autonomy and its determination to maintain control over AI development within its borders.

Industry observers are quick to see the irony. Apple, a company that prides itself on vertical integration and maintaining strict control over its ecosystem, must now consider ceding some of that control to Chinese partners. The company has successfully rolled-out of Apple Intelligence (AI) features in the US and other regions since October, using its own infrastructure and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, in stark contrast with the compromises it will need to make in China.

JP Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee’s projection of a potential delay until the second half of 2025 without local partnerships isn’t just a timeline – it’s a warning. The longer Apple takes to navigate the regulatory waters, the more ground it cedes to domestic competitors like Huawei, which has already integrated AI capabilities into its latest smartphones.

Beyond the business implications lies a more fundamental question: What happens when Western innovation meets Chinese regulation? Apple’s predicament exemplifies the growing tension between global tech ambitions and national digital sovereignty. The requirement to use pre-approved large language models from Chinese firms isn’t just about regulatory compliance – it’s about data control, technological independence, and, ultimately, political power.

For Apple, the choice ahead is clear yet complicated: partner with local firms and potentially compromise on its AI features’ independence or risk losing ground in a market crucial to its global success. This isn’t just Apple’s dilemma; it’s a preview of the challenges that await any Western tech company hoping to deploy AI solutions in China.

As the situation unfolds, one thing becomes certain: the era of seamless global tech deployment is giving way to a more fragmented digital world, where national boundaries increasingly define the limits of technological innovation. Apple’s journey through China’s regulatory landscape may be the start of the chapter in future history books describing how global tech companies became local technology businesses.

The post Apple’s AI ambitions hit the great Chinese firewall: partner or perish? appeared first on TechWire Asia.